Journal of ART in SOCIETY
  • Home
  • What readers say about us
  • Author details
  • Art book and film reviews
    • Reviews of art books
    • Reviews of art films
  • Top social media posts of the month
  • ARTICLES
  • Cultural trends and changes
    • Exploring Gustave Caillebotte’s Paris Street, Rainy Day
    • A very rich book for the very rich
    • Millet and the Angelus
    • The Two Women in White
    • Elsheimer’s Flight into Egypt: how it changed the boundaries between art, religion and science
    • Feathers, fashion and animal rights
    • On the Trail of the Last Supper
    • Floating pleasure worlds of Paris and Edo
    • Toulouse-Lautrec, the bicycle and the women's movement
    • From the Rokeby Venus to Fascism Pt 1: Why did suffragettes attack artworks?
    • From the Rokeby Venus to Fascism Pt 2: the Strange Allure of Fascism
    • The Futurists declare war on pasta
    • The art of giraffe diplomacy
    • Science becomes Art
  • Catastrophes and scandals
    • How one man saved the greatest picture in the world: Piero della Francesca’s Resurrection
    • Vermeer’s concert, the Gardner collection, and the art heist of the century
    • The Controversies of Constantin Brancusi: Princess X and the boundaries of art
    • Surviving the Black Death
    • Julie Manet, Renoir and the Dreyfus Affair
    • Art and Survival in Patagonia
    • The Isenheim Altarpiece Pt 1: Pestilence and the Concert of Angels
    • The Isenheim Altarpiece Pt 2: Nationalism, Nazism and Degeneracy
    • The shocking birth and amazing career of Guernica
  • Forgotten Women Artists
    • Forgotten Women Artists: introduction
    • Forgotten Women Artists: #1 Arcangela Paladini: The Rapid Rise and Fall of a Prodigy
    • Forgotten Women Artists: #2 Jane Loudon
    • Forgotten Women Artists: #3 Marie-Gabrielle Capet: Stepping out from the Shadows
    • Forgotten Women Artists #4: Michaelina Wautier: entering the limelight after 300 years
    • Forgotten Women Artists #5 Thérèse Schwartze and the business of painting
    • Forgotten Women Artists: Christina Robertson: A Scottish artist in Russia
  • Lost and found art
    • Murder, Caravaggio and The Taking of Christ
    • The rescue of the fabulous lost library of Deir al-Surian
    • Lost masterpieces of ancient Egyptian art from the Nebamun tomb-chapel
    • The Sphinx of Delft: Jan Vermeer’s demise and rediscovery
    • Carpaccio’s double enigma: Hunting on the Lagoon and the Two Venetian Ladies
    • Bernardo Bellotto and the reconstruction of Warsaw
    • The discovery of an early graphic novel
    • Michelangelo's disputed Entombment
  • All about Bruegel
    • Bruegel’s White Christmas: The Census at Bethlehem
    • The emergence of the winter landscape
    • Bruegel and the Two Faces of Summer
    • Bruegel's Peasant Wedding Feast
    • Lost in Translation: Bruegel’s Tower of Babel
    • Perception and Blindness in the 16th Century
    • "All life is here": Bruegel's 'Way to Calvary'
    • Bruegel's Icarus and the perils of flight
  • Lives and livelihoods
    • The extraordinary career of Granville Redmond, deaf artist and silent movie actor
    • Rose-Marie Ormond: Sargent’s muse and “the most charming girl that ever lived”
    • Dr Jekyll, Frankenstein and Shelley’s Heart
    • The Adventures of Nadar: photography, ballooning, invention & the Impressionists
    • Colonial artist, thief, forger and mutineer: Thomas Barrett's amazing career
    • Watchmen, goldfinders and the plague bearers of the night
    • Sarka of the South Seas
    • Should artists get royalties?
    • Strange encounters: the collector, the artist and the philosopher
  • Techniques and technology
    • The Art of Shadows
    • Art as a barometer of climate changes
    • The life and death of Mummy Brown
    • Egyptian blue: the colour of technology
    • Prussian blue and its partner in crime
    • Why wasn't photography invented earlier?
    • Comets in Art
    • Art in a Speeded Up World >
      • Art in a Speeded up World: overview
      • Changing concepts of time
      • The 'new' time in literature
      • The 'new' time in painting
    • Early influences of photography >
      • Pt 1: Initial impacts
      • Pt 2: Photography as a working aid
      • Pt 3: Photographic effects
      • Pt 4: New approaches to reality
  • Authenticity and meaning
    • Deception and Misdirection: Hieronymus Bosch’s The Conjuror
    • Reflections on a Masterpiece: Manet's A Bar at the Folies-Bergere
    • An exploration of vision, reality and illusion
    • Carpaccio's Miracle on the Rialto
    • Masters of All they Survey -- Gainsborough’s Mr and Mrs Andrews
    • Understanding Petrus Christus’ A Goldsmith in his Shop
    • Titian, Prudence and the three-headed beast
    • The origins of an Australian art icon
  • FINDING INFO
  • Most recent articles
  • Most popular articles
  • Country-by-country guide
  • Art timeline
  • Copyright and permissions
  • Contact us
Follow us on Twitter

Understanding Petrus Christus’
​A Goldsmith in his Shop

By Philip McCouat                                    For readers' comments on this article, see here

What we can see

​Petrus Christus’ A Goldsmith in his Shop (1449) depicts a red-clad goldsmith at his counter, weighing a golden ring on his scales. Just behind him, an expensively-dressed man and woman are watching him at work, the man with a proprietorial arm around the woman’s shoulders, the woman stretching out her hand for something. The man and woman are evidently a couple, and their sumptuous and fashionable clothing mark them either as members of the court of the Duke of Burgundy (Philip the Good) or the few wealthy burghers who were able to mix with the aristocracy [1]. A red wedding girdle lying on the counter confirms that are betrothed, and the ring in the goldsmith’s scales is likely to be a wedding ring that they are inspecting, the man rather appraisingly, the woman possibly more eagerly. Oddly, however, the goldsmith’s attention is not focused on the scales, nor on the couple, but of something off to the side, towards the source of light, out of our sight.   

​This painting is a fine example of how much an artwork can tell us, if only we know where to look, and are able to appreciate the significance of its many small details. In this article -- even though we may just be scratching the surface -- we’ll attempt to do just that.

Picture
Fig 1: The Goldsmith in His Shop (1449), Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Signed (translated, reads “magister Petrus Christus made this in the year 1449”) 100 cm x 85 cm

The goldsmith’s tools of trade

We see the goldsmith sitting surrounded by a wide range of the implements of his trade [2]. Their sheer variety attest to the role important of goldsmiths in the service of both religious and secular segments of the community [3].
​
On the top shelf (Fig 1), there are a number of pewter donation pitchers, which the city’s aldermen might offer to distinguished guests on official occasions [4]. On the edge of the shelf (Fig 2) a fancy buckle hangs above a string with amber beads. On the lower level, we can see a tray full of rings, a wallet of loose gems, a panel with samples of brooches, a coconut-shell goblet, a piece of red coral, and two small stone plinths leaning against the back wall. On the far right stands a gold and glass vessel, with a pelican at its apex pricking its breast to feed its young, a traditional depiction of self-sacrifice, reflecting the fate of Christ; it was possibly used for relics or consecrated wafers [5]. Hanging from a nail are two fossilised shark teeth; these were believed to detect poison by changing colour on contact (these were sometimes referred to as “serpents’ tongues”).
Picture
Fig 2: Detail of the painting, showing items on shelves
Many of these gems and other items on display were also believed to have powerful protective qualities; the ruby, for example, “resists poyson, resists sadness, restrains lust, drives away frightful dreams, clears the mind, keeps the body safe and, if a mischance be at hand, it signifies this by turning of a darker colour” [6]. Sapphires were said to heal ulcers, eye diseases, and amber to protect from diseases of the throat. Branched coral could be used to fend off the evil eye or stop bleeding, and coconut shell could counter poisoning [7]. 
​
In the foreground, on the bench, the goldsmith is weighing a ring with a pair of scales, with the weights being taken from a round-lidded receptacle. There is a scattering of gold coins, possibly reflecting the inclusion of money changers in the goldsmiths’ guild. The traditional wedding girdle, no doubt associated with the couple, lies gracefully curled on the bench. On the viewer’s right, a cleverly-placed convex mirror reflects the street outside with the characteristically red-brick facades of Bruges houses, and a gentleman and his falconer standing looking into the shop. As the falcon was sometimes suggestive of pride (as was a mirror), it’s possible that Christus was reminding us here of the imperfections of the outside world, in contrast to the supposedly admirable virtue of the betrothed couple [8]. 
Picture
Fig 3: Detail of painting, showing convex mirror
Christus’s use the mirror to create this trick of perspective enables the viewer to simultaneously see what lies before her/ him (the goldsmith) and what lies behind (the falconer and the city). Christus’ highly-influential predecessor, Jan van Eyck, was similarly interested in exploring the depiction of convincing perspective (and of meticulous detail), and used a similar device in his famous Arnolfini Wedding. In that painting, the convex mirror – this time situated behind the betrothed couple -- enables the viewer to see both the front and back of the couple (and the reflection of the otherwise unseen artist).  
Picture
Fig 4A: Jan van Eyck, ‘The Arnolfini Wedding’ (1434), with mirror on back wall
Picture
Fig 4B: Detail of mirror from ‘The Arnolfini Wedding’

Saint or artisan, or both?

Traditionally, the goldsmith in this painting was believed to represent St Eligius (or St Eloy), the patron saint of the guild of goldsmiths, blacksmiths and moneychangers. Eligius, born in the 6th century, had been a highly skilled craftsman whose work attracted royal favour patronage, His pious nature led to his appointment as a bishop, and he was credited with attracting many followers, founding several monasteries and churches in the Bruges area, and inspiring a number of miracles [9]. 
​
However, it is now generally believed that it is not the saint being portrayed here, but simply a goldsmith. A crucial factor in this reinterpretation was the changed status of a halo which, in the past, had appeared on the goldsmith. This of course had suggested saintliness but, in 1993, after some decades of controversy over its authenticity, the halo was determined to have been added to the original painting, probably in the 19th century, and it was accordingly removed [10].  
Picture
Fig 5: Detail of ‘The Goldsmith in his Shop’: the goldsmith with halo, before restoration
Without this halo, there is little evidence left to suggest that the goldsmith is saintly. What’s more, the goldsmith here bears little resemblance to the traditional representations of St Eligius [11], which usually show him as a mitred bishop, dressed in ecclesiastical garb, typically holding a hammer. None of these characteristics appear in this painting. Nor was there any episode in the saint’s life that would account for the presence of the young couple [12]. The fact that Christus used extensive modelling in the underdrawing for the goldsmith’s face – much more than for the couple – also supports the view that the painting is a portrait of an actual person, not an object of devotion. 

Tracking down the goldsmith – and the couple 

So if the figure is not a saint, but simply a goldsmith, is it of some particular goldsmith?

​Commentator Hugo van der Velden has in fact proposed that it is the Bruges goldsmith Willem van Vlueten [13] and, furthermore, that the scene depicted refers to an actual transaction involving a specific couple, not just a generic or ideal aristocratic couple. In 1440. this goldsmith had been commissioned by Philip the Good, the Duke of Burgundy, to provide a large quantity of gold and silver metalwork as a gift to his niece Mary of Guelders on the occasion of her marriage to James II, King of Scots. 
Picture
Fig 6: Rogier van der Weyden, ‘Philip the Good, Duke of Burgundy’ (1450, copy)
Van der Velden suggests that the goldsmith Vlueten later engaged Christus to produce a painting to imaginatively commemorate and advertise this extraordinarily prestigious, important and profitable commission [14]. Such a practice was apparently relatively common at the time among highly successful goldsmiths. In much the same way, the owners of a present-day racehorse that had won a major race might engage an artist to make a painting of the successful race; or a food supplier may advertise that its products are supplied by appointment to the Crown.
​
This, however, does not mean that the moment depicted in the painting is meant to be a faithful representation of an occasion that actually took place in the workshop -- rather, it simply creates an imaginary scenario to illustrate the fact that Vuelten was the supplier of Philip the Good’s gift of gold and metalwork [15]. The large scale of the painting – it’s a metre high -- with its figures almost life-size, also supports the view that it was intended for such public display, rather than for private devotion. 

Bruges as an artistic centre

Before we leave this intriguing painting, we should say a word about its geographical context, 15th century Bruges.

It's very fitting that this city should be the setting for a painting that extolled the importance of a goldsmith. Christus had probably settled there in the 1440s, at a time when the city was successfully recovering from a period of social and political turmoil [16]. Bruges was an attractive option because of its financial and commercial prosperity, the possibility of lucrative commissions from the regular presence of the ducal court, and the tastes of luxury-loving local businessmen who were a major source of artistic patronage [17]. Immigrants in fact comprised almost a third of all artists working in Bruges in this era (including van Eyck, Hans Memling and Gerard David) and similar considerations attracted other specialised skilled craftspeople such as furriers, hatters, jewellers and – of course -- goldsmiths.

However, this golden era would not last. Over ensuing decades, Bruges’ international and commercial importance would be eroded by its rapidly-growing rival Antwerp [18]. One factor in this change was the gradual silting up of the Zwin, the connection between Bruges and the North Sea. Another, ironically enough, was Bruges’ over-reliance on the production of luxury goods, rather than more readily tradeable commodities. In time, Antwerp’s more nimble and diversified trade would enable it to take over as the most prominent harbour and centre of commerce and finance in the region.


© Philip McCouat, 2020. First published November 2020.
We welcome your comments on this article.
RETURN TO HOME

End Notes 

[1] Rose-Marie and Rainer Hagen, What Great Paintings Say, Volume 1, Taschen, Cologne, 2003, at 47.
[2] Christopher J Duffin, “Geological Prophylactics in Petrus Christus' Painting A Goldsmith in his shop possibly Saint Eligius (1449) at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268687003; Hagen, op cit, at 48.
[3] Maryan W Ainsworth, with Maximiliaan Martens, Petrus Christus, Renaissance Master of Bruges, Exhibition Catalogue, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 1994, 96 ff, at 98.
[4] Ainsworth, Petrus Christus, op cit, at 98.
[5] Ainsworth, Petrus Christus, op cit, at 98.
[6] Duffin, op cit.
[7] Hagen, op cit at 46; Duffin, op cit.
[8] Ainsworth, Petrus Christus, op cit, at 98.
[9] Hagen, op cit, at 46. 
[10] Hugo van der Velden, “Defrocking St Eloy: Petrus Christus’s Vocational Portrait of a Goldsmith”, Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art, Vol. 26, No. 4 (1998), pp. 242-276; Maryan W Ainsworth, “Intentional Alterations of Early Netherlandish Painting”, Essay in Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, January 2008.
[11] Velden, op cit at 244.
[12] Velden, op cit at 246.
[13] Velden, op cit at 242.
[14] Velden, op cit at 257-261. See, for example, van Eyck’s portrait of prominent Bruges goldsmith Jan de Leeuwn (1436).
[15] Velden, op cit at 262.
[16] Maximiliaan Martens, in Ainsworth, Petrus Christus, op cit at 15
[17] Martens, op cit at 4ff. Christus would also have been attracted by the fact that the fee required to obtain citizenship (and therefore membership of the painters’ guild) had recently been reduced.   
[18] Martens, op cit. On the growth of Antwerp, see our article Lost in Translation http://www.artinsociety.com/lost-in-translation-bruegelrsquos-tower-of-babel-new-page.html

© Philip McCouat, 2020.
RETURN TO HOME