Journal of ART in SOCIETY
  • Home
  • What readers say about us
  • Author details
  • Art book and film reviews
    • Reviews of art books
    • Reviews of art films
  • Top social media posts of the month
  • ARTICLES
  • Cultural trends and changes
    • Exploring Gustave Caillebotte’s Paris Street, Rainy Day
    • A very rich book for the very rich
    • Millet and the Angelus
    • The Two Women in White
    • Elsheimer’s Flight into Egypt: how it changed the boundaries between art, religion and science
    • Feathers, fashion and animal rights
    • On the Trail of the Last Supper
    • Floating pleasure worlds of Paris and Edo
    • Toulouse-Lautrec, the bicycle and the women's movement
    • From the Rokeby Venus to Fascism Pt 1: Why did suffragettes attack artworks?
    • From the Rokeby Venus to Fascism Pt 2: the Strange Allure of Fascism
    • The Futurists declare war on pasta
    • The art of giraffe diplomacy
    • Science becomes Art
  • Catastrophes and scandals
    • How one man saved the greatest picture in the world: Piero della Francesca’s Resurrection
    • Vermeer’s concert, the Gardner collection, and the art heist of the century
    • The Controversies of Constantin Brancusi: Princess X and the boundaries of art
    • Surviving the Black Death
    • Julie Manet, Renoir and the Dreyfus Affair
    • Art and Survival in Patagonia
    • The Isenheim Altarpiece Pt 1: Pestilence and the Concert of Angels
    • The Isenheim Altarpiece Pt 2: Nationalism, Nazism and Degeneracy
    • The shocking birth and amazing career of Guernica
  • Forgotten Women Artists
    • Forgotten Women Artists: introduction
    • Forgotten Women Artists: #1 Arcangela Paladini: The Rapid Rise and Fall of a Prodigy
    • Forgotten Women Artists: #2 Jane Loudon
    • Forgotten Women Artists: #3 Marie-Gabrielle Capet: Stepping out from the Shadows
    • Forgotten Women Artists #4: Michaelina Wautier: entering the limelight after 300 years
    • Forgotten Women Artists #5 Thérèse Schwartze and the business of painting
    • Forgotten Women Artists: Christina Robertson: A Scottish artist in Russia
  • Lost and found art
    • Murder, Caravaggio and The Taking of Christ
    • The rescue of the fabulous lost library of Deir al-Surian
    • Lost masterpieces of ancient Egyptian art from the Nebamun tomb-chapel
    • The Sphinx of Delft: Jan Vermeer’s demise and rediscovery
    • Carpaccio’s double enigma: Hunting on the Lagoon and the Two Venetian Ladies
    • Bernardo Bellotto and the reconstruction of Warsaw
    • The discovery of an early graphic novel
    • Michelangelo's disputed Entombment
  • All about Bruegel
    • Bruegel’s White Christmas: The Census at Bethlehem
    • The emergence of the winter landscape
    • Bruegel and the Two Faces of Summer
    • Bruegel's Peasant Wedding Feast
    • Lost in Translation: Bruegel’s Tower of Babel
    • Perception and Blindness in the 16th Century
    • "All life is here": Bruegel's 'Way to Calvary'
    • Bruegel's Icarus and the perils of flight
  • Lives and livelihoods
    • The extraordinary career of Granville Redmond, deaf artist and silent movie actor
    • Rose-Marie Ormond: Sargent’s muse and “the most charming girl that ever lived”
    • Dr Jekyll, Frankenstein and Shelley’s Heart
    • The Adventures of Nadar: photography, ballooning, invention & the Impressionists
    • Colonial artist, thief, forger and mutineer: Thomas Barrett's amazing career
    • Watchmen, goldfinders and the plague bearers of the night
    • Sarka of the South Seas
    • Should artists get royalties?
    • Strange encounters: the collector, the artist and the philosopher
  • Techniques and technology
    • The Art of Shadows
    • Art as a barometer of climate changes
    • The life and death of Mummy Brown
    • Egyptian blue: the colour of technology
    • Prussian blue and its partner in crime
    • Why wasn't photography invented earlier?
    • Comets in Art
    • Art in a Speeded Up World >
      • Art in a Speeded up World: overview
      • Changing concepts of time
      • The 'new' time in literature
      • The 'new' time in painting
    • Early influences of photography >
      • Pt 1: Initial impacts
      • Pt 2: Photography as a working aid
      • Pt 3: Photographic effects
      • Pt 4: New approaches to reality
  • Authenticity and meaning
    • Deception and Misdirection: Hieronymus Bosch’s The Conjuror
    • Reflections on a Masterpiece: Manet's A Bar at the Folies-Bergere
    • An exploration of vision, reality and illusion
    • Carpaccio's Miracle on the Rialto
    • Masters of All they Survey -- Gainsborough’s Mr and Mrs Andrews
    • Understanding Petrus Christus’ A Goldsmith in his Shop
    • Titian, Prudence and the three-headed beast
    • The origins of an Australian art icon
  • FINDING INFO
  • Most recent articles
  • Most popular articles
  • Country-by-country guide
  • Art timeline
  • Copyright and permissions
  • Contact us
Follow us on Twitter

Endnotes 
Why Wasn't photography invented earlier?

To return to your place in the text, just click your Back button.
 
[1] The daguerreotype, named after its inventor Louis Daguerre, was quickly followed (but not superseded) by Fox Talbot’s “calotype”, which was printed on paper (instead of a silvered copper surface), had less precise definition and was less durable, but could produce a “warmer” effect and – importantly – could be reproduced.
[2] Niepce died in poverty in 1833. His prototype “heliograph” View from the Window at Le Gras (ca 1826) disappeared in 1900 and was only rediscovered in 1951 (Koetzle, H-M, Photo Icons: The Story Behind the Pictures 1827-1926, Taschen, Cologne, 2002).
[3] Hyatt Mayor, A, "The Photographic Eye", Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, Vol 5, No 1 (1946) 15-26, at 20.[4] Batchen, G, Each Wild Idea, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2001
[5] Galassi, P, “Before Photography: Painting and the Invention of Photography”, Exh Cat, Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1981. 
[6] Gernsheim, H and A, The History of Photography: From the Camera Obscura to the Beginning of the Modern Era, McGraw Hill, New York, 1969, at 13
[7]  Gernsheim, op cit, at 31 note 6
[8] Eder, J M, (transl Epstean, E), History of Photography, Dover Publications, New York, 1978 reprint at 62.
[9] Gernsheim, op cit at 34; 

[10]  Cottinton, I, “Platinum and Early Photography”, Platinum Metals Review, 1984 vol 28(4), 178
[11] This stop-start development timeline was mirrored in many other contexts. For example, the Bell Curve was first “discovered” by De Moivre in 1733, first published in 1738, picked up by Gauss decades later, rediscovered by Laplace in 1810 and finally accepted as having general application in the 1830s.
[12] In this novel, a traveller in the African desert is transported by a whirlwind to a land whose inhabitants are able to fix the images made by light rays. He describes how using “a most subtle matter, very viscous and proper to harden and dry”, coated on canvas, these images are impressed in “the twinkle of an eye”, after which the canvas is dried in a dark place for an hour. Once dry, the pictures “cannot be imitated by art or damaged by time” (Newton, G, Shades of Light:  Photography and Australia 1839-1988, Australian National Gallery, Canberra, 1988, Introduction).
[13]  Snyder, J, “Review of Galassi’s ‘Before Photography’ ”, Studies in Visual Communication 8 No 1 Winter 1982, 116 
[14] These included Talbot’s discovery in 1834/5 of differential light sensitivity in different forms of the same silver compound (Snyder, op cit).
[15] Bruce, R V, “Alexander Graham Bell”, National Geographic Vol 174 No 3 Sep 1988 358, at 372. 
[16] Frugoni, C, Inventions of the Middle Ages, Folio Society, London, 2007, at 23-25. In the interim, people had evidently experimented with handles, caps with hooks attached, and even clamps attached to the wearer’s temples, without hitting on the solution.
[17] Mandel, G N, “Patently Non-Obvious: Empirical Demonstration that the Hindsight Bias Renders Patent Decisions Irrational” Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 67, p. 1391, 2006; 1st Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper. This phenomenon has also been described as "creeping determinism" : Fischhoff, B, "An Early History of Hindsight Research", Social Cognition, Vol 25, No 1, 2007 at p 10; Fischhoff, B, "Hindsight ≠ Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty", Jnl of Experimental Psychology, 1973, Vo1, No 3 at 288; Gladwell, M, "Connecting the Dots", in What the Dog Saw, and Other Adventures, Allen Lane, 2009 at 249.
[18] Mandel, op cit
[19] Mandel, op cit. Hindsight bias is, of course, commonly recognised in everyday usage, in the ironic use of expressions such as “20-20 hindsight”, the “wisdom of hindsight”, the expression "it is easy to be wise after the event", or the concept of the “Monday morning quarterback”, 
[20] Clarke, A C, Profiles of the Future, Pan Books, London, 1982 at 20. It is interesting that many of these inventions span more than one traditional discipline, similarly to photography, which lies at the junction of art and science.


To return to your place in the text, just click your Back button

© Philip McCouat 2012, 2013, 2014

Mode of citation: Philip McCouat, "Why wasn't photography invented earlier?", Journal of Art in Society, www.artinsociety.com

We welcome your comments on this article