Journal of ART in SOCIETY
  • Home
  • Art book and film reviews
    • Reviews of art books
    • Reviews of art films
  • Top art tweets of the month
  • Cultural trends and changes
    • A very rich book for the very rich
    • Millet and the Angelus
    • The Two Women in White
    • Bruegel’s White Christmas: The Census at Bethlehem
    • Elsheimer’s Flight into Egypt: how it changed the boundaries between art, religion and science
    • The rescue of the fabulous lost library of Deir al-Surian
    • Feathers, fashion and animal rights
    • Lost masterpieces of ancient Egyptian art from the Nebamun tomb-chapel
    • On the Trail of the Last Supper
    • Floating pleasure worlds of Paris and Edo
    • The emergence of the winter landscape
    • Toulouse-Lautrec, the bicycle and the women's movement
    • From the Rokeby Venus to Fascism Pt 1: Why did suffragettes attack artworks?
    • From the Rokeby Venus to Fascism Pt 2: the Strange Allure of Fascism
    • The Futurists declare war on pasta
    • The art of giraffe diplomacy
    • Science becomes Art
  • Catastrophes and scandals
    • Vermeer’s concert, the Gardner collection, and the art heist of the century
    • The Controversies of Constantin Brancusi: Princess X and the boundaries of art
    • Bernardo Bellotto and the reconstruction of Warsaw
    • Surviving the Black Death
    • Julie Manet, Renoir and the Dreyfus Affair
    • Art and Survival in Patagonia
    • The Isenheim Altarpiece Pt 1: Pestilence and the Concert of Angels
    • The Isenheim Altarpiece Pt 2: Nationalism, Nazism and Degeneracy
    • The shocking birth and amazing career of Guernica
  • Forgotten Women Artists
    • Forgotten Women Artists: introduction
    • Forgotten Women Artists: #1 Arcangela Paladini: The Rapid Rise and Fall of a Prodigy
    • Forgotten Women Artists: #2 Jane Loudon
    • Forgotten Women Artists: #3 Marie-Gabrielle Capet: Stepping out from the Shadows
    • Forgotten Women Artists #4: Michaelina Wautier: entering the limelight after 300 years
    • Forgotten Women Artists #5 Thérèse Schwartze and the business of painting
  • Lives and livelihoods
    • The Sphinx of Delft: Jan Vermeer’s demise and rediscovery
    • Rose-Marie Ormond: Sargent’s muse and “the most charming girl that ever lived”
    • The extraordinary career of Granville Redmond, deaf artist and silent movie actor
    • Dr Jekyll, Frankenstein and Shelley’s Heart
    • The Adventures of Nadar: photography, ballooning, invention & the Impressionists
    • Colonial artist, thief, forger and mutineer: Thomas Barrett's amazing career
    • Watchmen, goldfinders and the plague bearers of the night
    • Sarka of the South Seas
    • The discovery of an early graphic novel
    • Should artists get royalties?
    • Strange encounters: the collector, the artist and the philosopher
  • Techniques and technology
    • Art as a barometer of climate changes
    • The life and death of Mummy Brown
    • Egyptian blue: the colour of technology
    • Prussian blue and its partner in crime
    • Why wasn't photography invented earlier?
    • Comets in Art
    • Art in a Speeded Up World >
      • Overview
      • Pt 1: Changing concepts of time
      • Pt 2: The 'new' time in literature
      • Pt 3: The 'new' time in painting
    • Early influences of photography >
      • Pt 1: Initial impacts
      • Pt 2: Photography as a working aid
      • Pt 3: Photographic effects
      • Pt 4: New approaches to reality
  • Authenticity and meaning
    • Bruegel's Peasant Wedding Feast
    • Understanding Petrus Christus’ A Goldsmith in his Shop
    • Lost in Translation: Bruegel’s Tower of Babel
    • Perception and Blindness in the 16th Century
    • "All life is here": Bruegel's 'Way to Calvary'
    • Carpaccio’s double enigma: Hunting on the Lagoon and the Two Venetian Ladies
    • Bruegel's Icarus and the perils of flight
    • Michelangelo's disputed Entombment
    • Titian, Prudence and the three-headed beast
    • The origins of an Australian art icon
  • Most recent articles
  • Most popular articles
  • Country-by-country guide
  • Art timeline
  • Author details
  • What readers say about us
  • Copyright and permissions
  • Contact us
Follow us on Twitter

End Notes
The Controversies of Constantin Brancusi ​

To return to your place in the main article, just click your Back button

Part 1
[1] 1876-1957. More correctly, “Brâncuși”.
[2] Stéphanie Giry, “An Odd Bird”, Legal Affairs, Sept/Oct 2002, http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/September-October-2002/story_giry_sepoct2002.msp
[3] A marble version of the same work also exists.
[4] Sanda Miller, Brancusi, Reaktion Books, London, 2010 at 61.
[5] Pontus Hulten et al, Brancusi, Faber and Faber, London, 1988 at 131.
[6] Hulton, op cit at 132.
[7] Roger Devigne, L’Eve Nouvelle, January 1920; Eric Shanes, Constantin Brancusi, Abbeville Press, New York, 1989 at 56.
[8] Sanda Miller, “Brancusi’s women”, Apollo (March 2007), 56 – 63.
[9] Quoted in Miller [note 4] at 60.
[10] Shanes, op cit at 55. According to Hulton, op cit at 130, Brancusi was simply inspired by the “graceful way” the lady gazed at herself in a mirror.
[11] 1882-1962; known to her family as Mimi: Miller, op cit [note 4] at 60.
[12] For a full account of Marie’s remarkable life, see Celia Bertin, Marie Bonaparte: A Life, Harcourt Brace Joyanovich, 1982.
[13] George’s closest friend was his uncle Waldemar, who accompanied the couple on their honeymoon. Waldemar was known as “Papa 2” by the couple’s children: see Bertin, op cit at 94.
[14] Published in the Jnl Bruxelles Médical under the pseudonym A E Narjani.
[15] Marie’s theory is today considered incorrect.
[16] Bertin, op cit at 155,
[17] Miller, op cit [note 4] at 60.
[18] Friedrich Teja Bach and ors, Constantin Brancusi, Exh Cat (1995) at 140; cited at Philadelphia Museum of Art website http://www.philamuseum.org/collections/permanent/51035.html
[19] Miller, op cit [note 4] at 62.
[20] Miller, op cit [note 8]
[21] Quoted earlier in this article.

Part 2
[22] This series would preoccupy him for some 20 years.
[23] Giry, op cit.
[24] C Brancusi v United States, Treasury Decisions, 54 no 43063.
[25] United States v Olivotti and Company, Treasury Decisions, 30 no 36309.
[26] For the detail of the court proceedings, I am indebted to Thomas L. Hartshorne’s “Modernism on Trial: C. Brancusi v. United States (1928)”, Journal of American Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1 (April 1986), pp. 93-104.
[27] Editor of Vanity Fair. 
[28] Other issues included whether the Bird was simply a copy, rather than an original.  The court accepted that it was one of a series of variations on a theme, with different materials and with different proportions, and that each of them were originals in their own right: Hartshorne, op cit.
[29] This question has also tended to get confused with the separate issue of what art is for.
[30] This emphasis was shared even by most of Brancusi’s witnesses.
[31] Giry, op cit.
[32] Sidney Geist, Brancusi, Hacker Art Books, New York, 1983 at 4, 5.
 
© Philip McCouat 2015

​Return to HOME